Labels

greed (5) WALMART (2) amazon (2) bad manners (2) beauty (2) blogging (2) crazy men (2) delusional people (2) etc. (2) no balls (2) relationships (2) the Bachelor (2) "teen mom" farrah abraham and her weird looking plastic surgery (1) 3rd party sellers (1) ASSHOLES (1) American Idol (1) BAD CHIPOTLE (1) BAD OVERPRICED FAST FOOD (1) CHRISTOPHER NOLAN (1) CON ARTISTS (1) DEATH (1) DESTRUCTION (1) DISCONNECTION (1) DOUCHE BAGS (1) EBAY and PAYPAL are a RIP-OFF. EBAY and PAYPAL lie to you. EBAY and PAYPAL hidden charges. EBAY and PAYPAL will take money out of your acct whenever they feel like it (1) ENTITLEMENT (1) FAT ON FOOD (1) HELP (1) HOW DO YOU POST VIDS? (1) INSTAGRAM (1) KARMA......blah blah (1) LEGITIMATE SITES THAT THEY SELL ON! NOT JUST AMAZON! (1) Les Miserables review (1) MEN (1) Marlboro (1) OLAY Total Effects Line and Dark Circle Minimizing Brush (1) RIP OFFS (1) RUDE BEHAVIOR (1) SCAMMERS: ZOVERSTOCKS & THEIR VARIOUS OTHER NAMES & SITES (1) ageism (1) all that beautiful wanna have it stuff that we don't necessarily think we can have anymore (1) are men not men anymore (1) bad customer service (1) bad food (1) bad website layout (1) big brother internet (1) blah blah (1) blah blah blah (1) blogger mess (1) braggarts (1) can't sleep (1) capitalism (1) cell phone company issues (1) character defects (1) cheating (1) chickenshit (1) christians (1) chynna phillips is a huge bitch (1) chynna phillips is an idiot (1) clothes men vs. women (1) comfort (1) company issues (1) complaining (1) cosmetic procedures (1) coupons (1) deformed feet (1) delivery service (1) denial (1) drug abuse (1) entertainment value (1) equality (1) esthetics (1) expenses. life is hard! (1) expenses. walmart too expensive! (1) fashion (1) fear (1) film remakes (1) foreign films (1) formatting (1) gays who don't admit it. bi-sexual. pretending (1) getting FAMOUS for NOTHING (1) getting ripped off. paying shipping for no shipping. assholes (1) girl with the dragon tattoo (1) great films (1) great singers (1) guilty pleasures (1) hair (1) happiness (1) high heels (1) i'm lost (1) impatience. irritation. me babbling. :P (1) individuality. (1) inflation (1) instant gratification (1) judgment (1) labels (1) link everything together whether you want to or not. (1) loneliness (1) love (1) makeup (1) masked man (1) misrepresentation (1) money wasted (1) most high film review (1) muscle milk (1) musicals (1) narcissists (1) never can take blame (1) night owl (1) non lasting relationships (1) not so great singers. FANTASTIC ACTORS! french literature at it's finest! (1) not sure what these labels r for. keywords is my guess. for search engines? (1) only ASSIGN blame. selfish (1) pain in the ass time wasting for naught (1) papa johns (1) patience (1) people knowing who they really are (1) people there is NO such product to fulfill ANY of these claims (1) peter pan syndrome (1) plastic surgery (1) priorities in the WRONG place (1) privacy issues (1) purpose (1) realism (1) relationship advice (1) romance (1) schwarzenegger (1) self-centered men. models with watermelon sized boobs. "top models". an oxymoron (1) shallowness (1) shipping delays. buying used item that's overpriced & still never received YET! (1) shootings (1) skin advice (1) smoking (1) sociopath (1) stupid internet lingo (1) subscribe & save (1) sweet people (1) taste (1) the VAGINA IS A SELF CLEANING OVEN (1) the bachelorette (1) the masked man (1) treating women well (1) tweakers (1) unrealistic ideals and expectations (1) uptight people (1) what happened to chivalry (1) what is expected from women these days (1) what men really want (1) women's bodies (1) wtf (1) youth/beauty obsessed culture (1)

Dec 23, 2012

I was just looking at a website i came upon about "Worst celebrity makeup" or something like that.....

http://starcrush.com/makeup-fails-courtney-love/
okay i'm a makeup artist, who YES, has worked in the industry, & on celebs, & while i'm not NECESSARILY disagreeing w/some of the statements made by the person who wrote these (though i pretty much AM disagreeing w/the majority of what she said: mainly because they have NO clue what they are talking about). "The No. 1 rule of makeup is balance. If you go heavy on the lips, go light on the eyes and vice versa", for example. no, that is NOT the #1 rule, nor is it even a "rule" per se. look at dearly departed kevin aucoin for example, or other world renowned & respected makeup artists. you CAN definitely go heavy on eyes AND lips at the same time. besides that, her eye makeup (courtney) is NOT even heavy at all!! there is little to no eye shadow, a smidge of liner and mascara, that hardly merits a HEAVY, smoky eye! so yeah, my basic point is this critic supposedly in the know here, or some self assigned expert; knows JACK SHIT! seriously!
last but not least, WHY should everyone look the same & fit some stupid media/celeb OBSESSED cultures definition & judgment of HOW makeup (or anything else for that matter) SHOULD look! once everyone looks the same & are a bunch of brainless drones following the leader or the fashion "experts", then everyone is pleased. ridiculous. whatever happened to creativity? expressing yourself? being DIFFERENT?? nope, can't have that! puhleeze
tell me this: WHO all remembers bjork's swan dress?? or even j. lo's low cut versace deal?? most of the world right? (granted, clothing, not makeup) (btw, i COMPLETELY remember gwyneth's horrible saggy boob dress & always will, but i thought her hair and makeup were fine, though i didn't really recall them at all. in fact i think seeing her eye makeup again, it looks pretty damn good. again though, it's NOT a "smoky eye" though. jesus, does anyone KNOW what an actual smoky eye IS?? it's not just more, or a lot of eye makeup!
anyway, as i was saying, people remember fashion risks, meat dresses, wild alien makeup and so on, but can anyone (besides a fashion or celeb obsessor) tell you what makeup so and so had on whatever year that was deemed "fabulous" or "perfect". doubtful. i can't, i'll tell you that & i have a great memory and am VERY visual.
it's all ridiculous. this factory of sameness. 

No comments: